The Other 90% - Introduction and the Process of Change continuation of part 1

What faulty assumption kills the process of change the most? Clearly it is a failure to understand that change, even under circumstances of superior procedure and resources almost always takes longer than anticipated. The process of change for any large human endeavor (including sports programs) is measured in years, not months or days. Under the best of circumstances, change takes two years; under normal circumstances change takes three to five years. And if the change is not brought about in five years, the venture is termed unsuccessful. Ironic how the theory world mirrors the actual world, since coaching contracts in big ventures are typically four or five years.

What circumstances help move along the process of change toward success? Change must be active and obvious. A support system must be quickly established in which players are invited to be the first to accept change and declare support, or else be pressured by others (taking into account normal variance of opinion) to get on board. Failure results in a declaration of nonsupport and usually to self-inflicted isolation or elimination. A change in “me” will result in a change in “we.” As participants in the process of change, players must expect obstacles to occur and become skilled in overcoming adversity of any type. Perhaps most importantly pre-established norms must be quickly stricken and replaced with strategies shown to be successful and inductive to change. Does any of this sound now eerily familiar?

And now the grand caveat of the article, what is the assessment of Coach Rodriguez and the process of change? Many observations are evident and lack mystique. Coach Rodriguez, as stated in his interviews, has undergone change in previous programs. It does not bother him, nor could he care less what others think of this wheel of change. Some view this as selfish and egotistical, but highly successful people have conducted themselves in such a manner for centuries, frequently, but not always, leaving scorched earth as a residue. . One of Coach’s first proclamations was that change will occur and it is likely to be over a two or three year period. Coach Rodriguez appears to now be at the stage of inviting others into the circle that supports change through the choice of commitment. Some will remain stubborn, but this is a given in human behavior. By osmosis, any successful coach seeks and gives loyalty and commitment to players and associates. But Coach is making them earn this badge by actions in the future, not the words of today. . Coach Rodriguez, by accident or design, has taken the most recognized step in the process of change. That step is overhauling, almost completely, the previous culture. But that strategy brings about another certainty of the process of change, namely conflict is an almost guaranteed side effect. And this is not all bad, because faster players should still wear the winged helmet. And different style players should still be outstanding citizens and receive a high quality education. And most importantly the associated goal of good citizenry can uphold the reputation of the university in the future.

Regarding football: take two aspirins and figure out a way to get better tomorrow.

written by Doc4blu and ErocWolverine

Thanks for stopping by http://gobluemichiganwolverine.blogspot.com/
If you have any questions please e-mail erocwolverine@gmail.com