Monday, August 31, 2009
GBMW: Things we want to address
GBMW: Things we want to address.
Contained within is some information that the readers may wish to consider.
GBMW lately has received e-mails questioning whether or not some specific articles, most notably last Saturday’s attention-getting offensive line concerns piece, were of a negative connotation. The explicit statements or inferences, by some, were that there should be nothing “negative” written about the Michigan program
Nothing would be nicer or more enjoyable than to present material of that nature. But such an approach from an intellectual and integrity standpoint would only be suited if absolutely every aspect of the U of M football program met the criteria that could lump sum be termed “perfecto.”
It takes little introspection and observation to conclude that a team with new leadership coming off a 3 and 9 season does not reach a lofty plateau of being “untouchable.” Therefore, we respectfully state that the fluff stops here.
Never make the mistake that those who contribute to this site have any agenda towards the program. The very opposite is true, as one would be hard pressed to find contributors more loyal and supportive of a life-long love, namely, Michigan football.
Before continuing, let us visit a quote from the ultimate Michigan Man, Coach Bo. On a broadcast shortly before he died, Bo stated, “Michigan is a poor tackling team.” And, of course, he was correct. Bo would have loved to say something like, “I am very proud of the exceptional tackling Michigan has displayed.” That approach was not his way.
If knowledgeable people see concerns, they will be addressed. Concerns will be identified and discussed, as will positive observations. As the program builds, and all here believe it will, they will be fewer concerns and more positives. Yes, here we all realize that some sites are very positive and negatives are taboo. Those here try not to be blind sheep or put the head in the sand. It is the hope of this site that readers not only tolerate but also support an approach such as this. Perhaps some sites will hide concerns and try to only produce "fluff pieces" to gain viewership, post counts, access from the university, and paying customers.
Unless you are a current fan of the Florida Gators, there will be concerns for “your” team this year. Sorry, that is the way it is, especially right before the season and also from practice observation.
When most Michigan fans are predicting 6-6, 7-5 or, at best, 8-4 this year, that to means the above predictors must see concerns as well. If there are no concerns anywhere in any program facet, why not just predict 12-0 and a chance at the National Championship?
We will be doing a grading scale that follows like this:
A = Great
B = Good
C = Average / Okay
D = Poor / Need Help
F = Hope and Pray for a great recruiting class at that position.
Thanks for stopping by Go Blue Michigan Wolverine
If you have any questions please E-Mail
Written by CoachBt and ErocWolverine
Sunday, August 30, 2009
GBMW: Regarding what Michigan should do about Media access:
GBMW: Regarding what Michigan should do about Media access:
Program observers complained, when Lloyd was head coach, about not getting access to program internals and questioned the reason for the "fort mentality" that started with Bo, and continued with Mo and Lloyd. Also, people negatively perceived how Lloyd treated some of the media. Some of us loved it, because in most cases media members were asking monumentally dumb questions (like the sideline reporter and now classic half-time interviews) and receiving an affirmation of their less than stellar cognitive ability from Coach Carr.
Now, all of a sudden, when Coach Rod came in and gave the media a little more access (more than in the past, but not as much as other schools), people were jumping up and down because they would get "glimpses" of the program that they were never privy to.
Funny how when something bad happens, people want to jump right back to a position that they did not previously endorse.
Why blame the entire media for this? If a university suddenly adopts a “closed door policy,” this sends a perception that something wrong did indeed occur. Closed door could be partial defined as no admittance, no talking to players, no observation of practice, and no communication with the coaches.
If anything, UM might want to consider the complete opposite and invite ESPN, Big Ten Network, CBSC and any other sport network groups in and let them do College Football Live, Big Ten Tonight, College Gameday type of shows from inside the Michigan practice facility. Necessary discussion would follow from Coach Rod, Bill Martin and the people who are in charge at Michigan to confirm that rules are and have been followed.
This is not a time to circle the wagons, as they say. The media would simply look at this as a sign that the program is trying to hide something. This is the time to address and deal with the stated “accusations.” It is a bad time to be sure and the timing of this outbreak must be called into question.
Some have reacted by suggesting as a remedy cutting off the Detroit Free Press’ access. Well, other media people would take that as a sign of the university playing "bully" and wonder if the university is indeed trying to hide something.
Although I am certainly not in a position to determine a course of action, let us return to an original concept, that of the individual reporter versus the collective mass of media. So perhaps a single reporter should be banned from the university. It is not far fetched to say an anti-Coach Rod, somewhat frenzied and compulsive, agenda drives some reporters. Coach Rod has stated the program follows the NCAA guidelines. This is where things stand.
This is a time to let Coach Rod, the athletic department and everybody at Michigan gather information and present documentation to the public. The final impression must be there is nothing to hide.
Keep in mind we have stated several times, ever since Coach Rod took over, this program is different and more demanding, compared to the past, for Michigan players to go through. This does not mean we are attacking Coach Rod, but we know that the players have worked very hard in the off-season. Also, we have reported from both spring Michigan clinics (2008-2009) we attended that both Coach Rod and Coach Barwis stated that the off-season workouts were voluntary. Coach Rod’s comment was something like this: "Off-season workouts are voluntary just like your playing time." Coach Barwis’ comment was something similar to: "Off-season workouts are voluntary, but so is breathing, and I do not see you stopping breathing".
There are a lot of programs around the country in college and high school that will be closely observing what happens with this “voluntary participation” issue. Why so much attention? Frankly almost every program has “voluntary” programs that are voluntary only by moniker. If you want to play football at any level - college or high school, voluntary is really mandatory. This sounds a little Yogi Berra like but this is the reality. Excellence has a price and it never entails sitting on the backside for an entire three months. The emphasis of athletics is a topic that has been bantered back and forth for decades. For better or worse, purist philosophy about college football at major universities is at low tide. For better or worse, the arena of 1950’s and 1960’s college football yields few if any similarities with twenty-first century norms . Change has wedged the two eras (purist versus competitive) apart to the point where the past will likely never return.
Do all of you remember the result of Coach Carr’s last voluntary summer program? Key players did little during the summer, showed up out of shape and ill-prepared, and got kicked by Appy State and Oregon. Someone could get plenty of frequent flyer miles trying to locate a major college program where all the players do not voluntarily show up and work out extensively the entire summer.
Even in high school football, coaches tell players, in an indirect way, to show up with their teammates to work-out, run routes, condition themselves, so that when practice really does start the players can hit the ground running, instead of starting from scratch. The coaches are not there, but the seniors are. Nowadays practice time seems to continue to be cut down and less and less time is allotted before the first game, compared to the past. One reason for the tighter restrictions mandated by governing bodies is that officials are clearly aware of the off-season workout programs being used at virtually all schools.
The agenda, integrity, and methods of the reporters and paper connected to this mess will comprise a separate discussion, one that certainly will follow. As you can imagine, there are obviously hundreds of sports reporters from local papers spending their entire summer monitoring practice time, interrogating players, attempting, by any means, to discredit college football programs.
In adding to the discussion on practice time and compliance, here are five points of interest for the team and the coaching staff from CoachBt:
1) This is indeed the last thing in the entire world Coach Rod and the staff need or want at this time. Yes, it probably provides some short term motivation, but you would 100% prefer your players to be focused on the season and not deal with this type of crap! Luckily, Coach Rod and the staff are not rookies and will know how to deal with this nonsense.
2) Michigan needs to get in front of this issue and not behind. Another way of saying this is be proactive and not reactive. And in our opinion the response needs to come from the administration or athletic dept. Coach Rod and staff have bigger, more important things to do at this time than deal with this distraction/accusation. But the issue cannot go unanswered and left to fester. The last thing Coach Rod and staff now need is more negative recruiting material. The program needs some very strong support from the bosses.
3) To the accusations, do Michigan/Coach Rod and staff push the line on NCAA regulations? Probably, but I will say we would be disappointed if they did not push the line in this matter. It is what is necessary to compete with the other elite programs. I know a player from LSU's National Championship season, and I have worked out with him. I have multiple friends on Ohio State's roster, and know players on Alabama and Iowa. I can go on and on, but you get the point. All these programs equally push the line. It is how the game is played today.
4) In our opinion this episode is going to come down to how one "defines" voluntary. In our opinion there is nothing wrong with explaining to kids what will happen if they do not participate in off- season workouts. As long as coaches do not coerce by threatening to take away their scholarship, they are in bounds.
5) Nobody wants the NCCA snooping around, period. Just the taint of an investigation can be a killer. Sometimes the limbo period is worse than what is actually found. I am hoping, but not expecting, for the NCAA to get this done and over with.
Thanks for stopping by Go Blue Michigan Wolverine
If you have any questions please E-Mail
Written by CoachBt and ErocWolverine
Michigan Volleyball: Great way to start the season
Congratulations to the Michigan Volleyball program on beating Nebraska who was 3rd in the nation in the rankings in their own tournament in Omaha, Nebraska and then beating Kansas State who was ranked 22nd.
The victory marks the first win by the Michigan program over a top-five ranked team.
Both games were on the CBSC network and replays will be on their network in case you missed it.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)